Now, we have fought Neerwinden before, albeit with some simplified 'bits' vs this version of the battle, but that was done with Field of Battle rules.
This time, we used 'Field of Battle Evolved' (not its real title), otherwise known as 'Battle Command 1700-1900'.
In terms of melee and shooting mechanics, movement dynamics and accounting for unit 'decay', it's the same game, however...the card deck is smaller and allows more options based upon the command dice roll - whether it is odd, even and the difference vs a D6.
That sounds simple, but the differences it makes in the game are quite epic. Eight cards rather than 25 or so , with card options and command choices, makes for a very different game. You are still working with the luck you are dealt, however the scale of that luck is largely up to your choice now (albeit maximised by great dice rolls).
Both setsshare the Piquet family DNA, randomized turn sequences via custom decks that create fog of war, fluid activation where both players act frequently, and opposed dice rolls for movement/combat, but Battle Command emphasizes deeper command-level decisions more aggressively.
The periods covered are a little tighter, but already there is also an ancient / medieval version, with a massive ww2 game to follow (with multiple scales of play).
Perhaps, this version is more conducive to command play (hence the title), over tactical play, which makes for very different decisions.
There is less chaos, and therefore a very different style of epic game-play. For instance, the army morale card in 'Field of Battle' can end a game very quickly, and randomly, whereas if it comes up here since your morale is gone, and you pass the roll, you have potentially a lot of time before it comes up again, to win the battle through good choices and sensible calls against the card choices.
 |
| '...the pub's that way Maam' |
We had some changes for 1693 - but these were simple. 'Pikes forward' could seal flanks, and the French used the 'La Gloire' principle and could immediate melee. This is diluted by the start of the Marlburian period.
 |
| The French left, Berwick on the flank with the Wild Geese |
 |
| French cavalry is historically posted in the centre, awaiting a breakthrough |
 |
| The new card design - the leadership roll, and whether odd or even, and the difference rolled, dictates the command choices. A very different approach to the game |
 |
| Attack on the French right - French and Swiss guards |
 |
| The French right masses for attack |
 |
| The French centre and right - French infantry prepares to smash at centre left |
 |
| The French assault on Rumsdorf |
 |
| French cavalry waits patiently, in the centre |
 |
| Allied counter-attack on the right |
 |
| As Rumsdorp falls to the French, the allied line hunkers down in its defences |
 |
| Berwick's troops head toward the allied defences at Laer |
 |
| French attack on their left, the Allied flank is under severe pressure now |
 |
| 'Steady lads!' |
 |
| 'Hold zee line!' |
 |
| Incredibly...a French breakthrough at Laer, as the Allies fall back... |
 |
| French infantry pour through the hole in the defences at Laer |
 |
| But...the French have suffered terrible losses in order to break through; their morale chips running out - BUT they pass their first morale roll...narrowly. |
 |
| French cavalry, which has waited for so long, thunders through the gap on the Allied right... |
 |
| ...thundering into the Allied lines, who counter-attack |
 |
| The French break the Allied line, however, they fail another morale check and wiithdraw, literally one card draw from the Allies having to make a roll - a VERY close game. |
 |
| "Sorry ladies..you'll have to go to another pub..." |
Now this question referred to the troops in the previous Aughrim 1691 game. These pretty much form the backbone of my 25mm troops (not 28mm, most were purchased in the 90s and early 2000s) for the period 1670-1715 - the single most maligned, misunderstood (and that's just by the rules-writers) and badly mis-interpreted period that exists in wargaming...possibly. So controversial it still gets people angry; so badly understood it still confounds researchers; and so maligned by history that many secrets still remain hidden in forgotten annals of folklore, more than stuffy academic history.
I won't mention fraising battalions with pikes, platoon firing and firing by ranks, cavalry charge methodologies (see Brent Nosworthy for all associated refs); instead I will focus on the important thing - 3mm MDF bases for the model troops, and 'how i got away with having more bases than I should have', otherwise known as the 'very capitalist MDF base economy' !
I use two main sets of rules for these so far: 'Field of Battle' and 'Volley & Bayonet'. Much lyrical waxing has taken place on these, in terms of why they work for the period - and are eminently more suited than some other rules, and there is an option to also look at a Blucher variant soon.
INFANTRY : based on 1.5" x 1.5" bases - this allows massive amounts of flexibility. ALSO - the little secret of using 3 figures (staggered) instead of 4 figures, saves an absolute multitude of cost and fannying about. In essence a four stand battalion with 16 figures, becomes 12 figures. Pics above show that this can be effective, with less figure bang for your buck.
Now these guys offer lots of options (old Dixon Grand Alliance - still the best figures for this period in my view)
...which can also be placed frontally to indicate 'fraising', or hedgehog, depending on year and rules
These Dutch guards, are densely packed on bases - and despite flop hat could be used right through the period