Field of Battle, as with Volley & Bayonet, delivers a very efficient, enjoyable and exciting game. Both are very different however; where V&B offers elegance, FoB offers just the right degree of chaos; where V&B makes book-keeping seem like part of the command experience, FoB rewards taking chances. ...Depending on what I want from a game, both sets are very relevant to the periods I indulge in.
I have not played enough Field of Battle 3, nor enough 1670-1720 recently, so dusted off, and out it came. We have tried Aughrim twice before, and for some reason, we keep playing the Jacobites historically, which is not the way to win the battle...
 |
| A view of the Jacobite position on Kilcommadan Hill, from Urraghry hill today, across the bog, which in 1691, was even more wet than it is now...and not in a good way. |
 |
| "This flank seems totally secure...what can possibly go wrong??? What's that? ...an ammunition wagon paid for though nefarious means and we let it get through...certainly, certainly, go on ahead there..." | |
More advisable is moving the centre forward to the enclosure line with reinforced shot elements, and blasting the allies as they come out of the bog, before the flanks are overwhelmed...I am sure we will try that next time...
 |
| The view from the 'virtual' Urraghry Hill |
 |
| Red vs Blue ...or something |
 |
| Jacobite skirmishers in their historic positions in the enclosures...in game, reinforcing these positions just as the allied/ Willliamite troops come out of the bog, would change the game... |
 |
| One the move |
 |
| Historically, Burke took delivery of the wrong calibre of ammunition at a critical juncture in the battle, and found that he could not shoot...critically, in our game, this happened very early. I'm sure there were no shenanigans (historically I mean...) |
 |
| The cavalry action on the Jacobite right, all seemed very one-sided at first, the Jacobites getting the better of the match. This would not last... |
 |
| Slow moving through the Irish bog...and no wellies |
 |
| Despite the ammunition problem at the ruined castle, matters would not go easy for the Williamites. |
 |
| ...and the opposite flank becomes a battle in itself |
 |
| The Jacobite ridgeline..."move down there lads, give them a volley or two..no?" |
 |
| The attack proceeds at half speed (I place troops in the bog 'out of command' in terms of the rules - it really works). |
 |
| Danish mercs attack the Bloody Hollow |
 |
| Englsih and Northern Irish put sever pressure on the centre as they start, slowly, to clear the bog... |
 |
| The guns fall quickly at the bloody hollow, very un-historically |
 |
| ...so much so that Jacobite infantry has to engage to hold the flank |
 |
| ...yet in the centre, they stay, very, very , still |
 |
| A view of the village, and the Jacobite left and centre - the pressure of allied cavalry is starting to tell... |
 |
| The centre could have been so very different, but the flanks become bloodbaths - two separate battles as the centre gains momentum |
 |
| Assaults of the Jacobite guns on both flanks |
 |
| Clearing the bog, at last |
 |
| Allied troops start to clear the enclosures of skirmishers - will they dare to assault the hill...or simply await the flank collapse... |
 |
| Taking the guns |
 |
| The Williamite right |
 |
| The attack on the Jacobite right and centre - Danes and English |
 |
| Firefight on the Jacobite right - the Danes are not likely to lose this... |
 |
| Inniskilling cavalry takes the causeway and the flank starts to fall on the Jacobite left |
 |
| Firefights in the centre, as the allies take the enclosures |
 |
| In the end, a cavalry breakthrough on the Jacobite right...and horse starts to flow behind the Jacobite lines on the hill.. |
 |
| On the left, a similar story- once the Jacobite cavalry is defeated at the causeway, the horse pour across, and the flank will not hold. |
Great rules once more - and always very evocative of the period. A very large game with around 35 units per side, and an entire historical battle. There aren't many rules that can handle that...
Now this question referred to the troops in the previous Aughrim 1691 game. These pretty much form the backbone of my 25mm troops (not 28mm, most were purchased in the 90s and early 2000s) for the period 1670-1715 - the single most maligned, misunderstood (and that's just by the rules-writers) and badly mis-interpreted period that exists in wargaming...possibly. So controversial it still gets people angry; so badly understood it still confounds researchers; and so maligned by history that many secrets still remain hidden in forgotten annals of folklore, more than stuffy academic history.
I won't mention fraising battalions with pikes, platoon firing and firing by ranks, cavalry charge methodologies (see Brent Nosworthy for all associated refs); instead I will focus on the important thing - 3mm MDF bases for the model troops, and 'how i got away with having more bases than I should have', otherwise known as the 'very capitalist MDF base economy' !
I use two main sets of rules for these so far: 'Field of Battle' and 'Volley & Bayonet'. Much lyrical waxing has taken place on these, in terms of why they work for the period - and are eminently more suited than some other rules, and there is an option to also look at a Blucher variant soon.
INFANTRY : based on 1.5" x 1.5" bases - this allows massive amounts of flexibility. ALSO - the little secret of using 3 figures (staggered) instead of 4 figures, saves an absolute multitude of cost and fannying about. In essence a four stand battalion with 16 figures, becomes 12 figures. Pics above show that this can be effective, with less figure bang for your buck.
Now these guys offer lots of options (old Dixon Grand Alliance - still the best figures for this period in my view)
...which can also be placed frontally to indicate 'fraising', or hedgehog, depending on year and rules
These Dutch guards, are densely packed on bases - and despite flop hat could be used right through the period